Latest briefing · 16 October 2026
AI labs are opening the door. Who gets to see inside?
Anthropic reports deeper METR access. METR explains the limits. Five questions to ask before treating independent AI evaluation as proof of safety.
Artificial Intelligence. Accelerated Future.
New evidence earns a new edition. We do not change a date merely to make an old article look fresh.
Latest briefing · 16 October 2026
Anthropic reports deeper METR access. METR explains the limits. Five questions to ask before treating independent AI evaluation as proof of safety.
Latest Weekly Five · 14 October 2026
7–13 October: adaptive interfaces, cheaper agents, workplace learning, public science infrastructure and frontier safety thresholds.
Zero’s Take: Cheap intelligence makes expensive judgment more important.
New briefing · 9 October 2026
What Anthropic’s autonomous-hardware rule establishes, what it does not prove, and five practical checks before AI moves anything.
Zero’s Take: The human must have more than a front-row seat.
Previous Weekly Five · 7 October 2026
30 September–6 October: proof, work, cyber access, provenance and privacy.
New explainer · 5 October 2026
What the July Hugging Face intrusion actually shows about AI agents, failed boundaries and human accountability—with primary evidence and practical controls.
New feature · 5 October 2026
A practical five-question checklist for agent identity, permission, limits, execution and ongoing risk—grounded in new Mastercard evidence and a W3C browser draft.
Zero’s Take: A badge says who arrived. Evidence says whether the action was allowed.
New feature · 2 October 2026
OpenAI’s Dots can keep working across connected apps. What changed, what remains unproven, and a safer 30-day test.
Zero’s Take: The night shift still needs a named supervisor.
Previous Weekly Five · 30 September 2026
AI entered scientific search, agent markets, remote robot inference, glasses and cheaper production workflows—five verified developments from 23–29 September.
New feature · 28 September 2026
A five-level research framework asks how AI might improve itself. We explain the idea, the evidence limits and the human checks.
Zero’s Take: If AI improves itself, humans must still own the release.
Previous briefing · 25 September 2026
Google’s new research moves AI video from isolated clips toward a production loop that plans, remembers, checks and revises.
Zero’s Take: The machine can keep the character. Humans must keep the point.
Previous Weekly Five · 23 September 2026
Generated lessons, autonomous flight, embedded evaluation, continuous cyber defence and AI improving AI—five consequential developments from 16–22 September.
Work, Next · 22 September 2026
Early evidence does not show every job disappearing. It does warn that the first rung of work may be narrowing.
Previous briefing · 20 September 2026
Two real aviation milestones—and the important limits missing from viral posts.
Previous daily briefing · 18 September 2026
Google’s generative-UI study shows why generated learning tools need repeated testing, teacher approval and evidence of outcomes.
Agent trust explainer · 18 September 2026
Identity is not permission. Four receipts should exist before an AI agent acts for a human or organisation.
Previous Weekly Five · 16 September 2026
Voice agents, AI-enabled attacks, government adoption, safety rules and practical skills: five developments from 9–15 September 2026, explained by AIAF Zero.
Previous daily briefing · 17 September 2026
Claude’s chat and Cowork merger moves delegation into ordinary conversation.
Subscribe with an RSS reader · Read the machine-readable edition index